Fasten a Southern China ＂ multilateral change ＂

Official media article: Either China and inferior fine installed issue fastens a \" of Southern China problem multilateral change \"

Chinese government media published an article yesterday, emphasize Nanhai (Southern China) the problem is not China and east alliance is organized (inferior fine how) the problem between, china with east the partial member country in alliance is put in Nanhai problem; On Nanhai problem, intentional nip east alliance \" copes with \" China, it is the illicit \" \" oneself forces actually at all east alliance member country, it is to attempt to force actually all east the \" that alliance member country is individual country is tortious \" endorses.

This problem is \" \" Nanhai problem is multilateral solving \" is bogus proposition \" article by in the media such as new network, xinhua net is published. Although official media does not have the setting that introduces an author, china of brief explain palpability is opposite Dan Wenzhang the basic attitude of Nanhai islands conflict, official color is clearer.

The article says, alliance regards a collaboration between southeast Asia country as the organization east, not be Nanhai problem when the thing square, also become Nanhai issue without reason when the thing square. It is originally China and east the Nanhai problem between country of alliance part member becomes China and east the problem between alliance, give China — necessarily east the development that alliance concerns creates an obstacle, those who damage is east the interest of alliance whole, those who damage is east alliance is all the interest of member country. This is right east those blame Nanhai problems in alliance member country should be inequity for thing country.

The article thinks, the core of Nanhai problem is controversy of dominion of territory of The Nansha Islands. China reachs his to add coastal waters region to have \" to The Nansha Islands the dominion of incontestable \" . 60 time end has 20 centuries at the beginning of 70 time, as international ocean legal system produces revolutionary change and marine development especially pace of development of resource of marine oil gas is accelerated ceaselessly, vietnam of Nanhai periphery country, Philippine, Malaysia, Brunei puts forward to The Nansha Islands in succession all or the part is domanial dominion requirement, among them arms of partial nation group is occupational partial island reef, nanhai problem arises from this.

\"Accordingly, the essence of Nanhai problem is China and 4 between the country bilateral questions that raise domanial position in Nanhai. Solve finally of Nanhai problem, also be by China and this 4 countries necessarily between bilateral talk things over and negotiate and reach. Also be by China and this 4 countries necessarily between bilateral talk things over and negotiate and reach..

The article points out, alleged Nanhai problem is multilateral problem, perhaps saying is the China and Vietnam, multilateral controversy problem between Philippine, Malaysia, Brunei, look like a fact, actual it is a bogus proposition. Because afore-mentioned Nanhai are circumjacent,requirement of alleged and territorial sovereign rights is the The Nansha Islands that is aimed at China, they mutual between alleged jackknife or the requirement of islands territory dominion that conflict each other, it is to build in territorial to Chinese The Nansha Islands sovereign rights unjustifiable on encroachment foundation. From this, nanhai problem should tell the version that passes multilateral channel to solve, also be a bogus proposition.

The article thinks, saying the Nanhai problem that is bilateral controversy substantially is multilateral problem, that is to say Nanhai problem \" multilateral change \" , unfruitful increase new complexity to this complex already Nanhai issue, more solve hard. Any is well-advised politician, any devotes oneself to to be mixed as soon as possible the politician that solves Nanhai problem finally, should can realise: Nanhai problem \" is multilateral changing \" is not the outlet that appropriate solves Nanhai problem.

The article says, advertise Nanhai problem \" multilateral the person that turns \" or force, still have a view, perhaps saying is \" of \" unspoken words in a play left to the understanding of the audience or reader, namely Chinese piece head is too big, other Nanhai sound alls alone national capital is Xiaoguo, cannot fight alone with Chinese singles. Nanhai problem \" multilateral change \" , with respect to the \" chip \" that can enhance these countries and Chinese contact with, can force \" of Chinese \" give in. But China is to pursue the criterion with size uniform and equal country all the time, sheet solves the practice of attrib border conflict to be able to prove with respect to China and terrestrial neighbour appropriate, china is solving problem of attrib border and territorial dispute all along not swashbuckling, with big bully small.

\"For circumjacent to Nanhai country, no matter be big country, still be Xiaoguo, it is to mix for expensive, ‘ fights internecine " . Settle dispute of territorial sovereign rights, of the basis is historical fact and legal principle basis, of the basis is accepted law of nations and international relation criterion, is not size of basis national power, also not be the force that combines " according to alleged ‘ . Also not be the force that combines \" according to alleged ‘ ..

The peace that the article points to to big country cares Nanhai area with \" outside the Nanhai region such as the United States and Japan and stable \" have a hand in Nanhai problem for excuse, the purpose uses menace of China of \" of Nanhai problem clamour to talk \" , in Chinese periphery the area creates tight situation, the relation between provocative China and Nanhai periphery country, the development of diversionary China, attempt to use Nanhai issue even country of threatening Nanhai periphery serves for his interest.

The article points out, actually, \" of internationalization of Nanhai problem \" , to circumjacent country, it is \" of Shuang Renjian of a \" undoubtedly. Common saying says: \"Ask a god to send a god easily difficult \" , will big country introduces Nanhai area outside region, can make only Nanhai problem more complication. \"Nanhai periphery country should have self-confidence, want us to peace solves the sincerity of conflict only, with the wisdom with our peculiar Oriental, can find fairness certainly reasonable, each just can accept settle way. Can find fairness certainly reasonable, each just can accept settle way..

The article emphasizes, terrain of current Nanhai area is overall and stable. China and east 10 countries signed alliance \" Nanhai each behavior is enunciative \" , relevant parties acceptance should settle the territory between both sides and jurisdictional dispute with peaceful way, do not adopt make controversy complications, the action of broaden the scope. Current, china is fulfilling enunciative and follow-up action to undertake be discussinged actively with concerned country, strive for decide specific collaboration project and way at an early date, begin Nanhai collaboration. Any not prejudiced person, can admitting Nanhai area terrain is peace and stability, the metropolis is right the situation that Nanhai area continues to maintain peace and stability has sufficient hope.

The article also is warned say, if Nanhai problem cannot get appropriate is handled, it is the area safety that evolves to be influence area peace and stability likely problem. Outside waiting for region to the United States, Japan for big country, want to gain profit for a long time in Nanhai, should pass peaceful negotiation appropriate to solve Nanhai problem to create advantageous exterior condition for Nanhai periphery country hard, is not in Nanhai area stir up trouble, nanhai of for fear that is not random.

\" round-the-world times \" published an article to say yesterday, on Nanhai problem, chinese all through the ages urges man-to-man negotiation, but certain state shows southeast Asia increasingly however the trend that wants to drive conflict internationalization. The insular reef conflict of Nanhai each other across, china regards Nanhai area force as the strongest one party, become the target that is on guard jointly very easily. China before it is dangerous that diplomacy dissolved this successfully, but the United States is going the issue adverse to China opposite way is pushed.

The article thinks, want to end the involute condition with current Nanhai, china should devote oneself to relatively will ambiguous strategy, become a clearer route chart. China emphasized \" laying aside principle of \" of controversy, joint development all the time in the past, but in be being operated actually, controversy often is laid aside very hard, joint development is done not quite again. How specific fulfil this principle, should become the main content in Nanhai route chart. Nanhai shares controversy of 200 isles existence, finding 9 breach is possible. In joint development only the respect obtains a breakthrough, form profit impact, ability changes territorial sea conflict is economic interest, break Nanhai conflict certainly will to bring about China and the anticipation that southeast Asia country conflicts thoroughly, make the United States inorganic can be multiplied.

Chinese government media publishs an article to say, it is originally China and east the Nanhai problem between country of alliance part member becomes China and east the problem between alliance, give China — necessarily east the development that alliance concerns creates an obstacle, those who damage is east the interest of alliance whole, those who damage is east alliance is all the interest of member country. This is right east those blame Nanhai problems in alliance member country should be inequity for thing country.